Sign in to your account
Don't have an account?
Sign up to unlock these benefits:
Reset your password
Check your email
Set a new password
Password updated
Email verified
Verification failed
AJ Smith-Shawver has a Developing profile, meaning his cycle-performance relationship is emerging but hasn’t fully stabilized. This most often applies to younger players who are still maturing physically or establishing consistent routines. The ratings can be useful, but carry more risk, especially with the minimal amount of games played.
Smith-Shawver’s Developing status means his performance patterns are still being established. It’s a stage where growth and uncertainty often go hand in hand. The ratings are informative, though less reliable with a narrow number of games.
| Level | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 11.3 | 11.25 | 2.25 | 0.333 | -93.89% |
| Good | 11 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 49.2 | 40 | 21 | 20 | 6 | 20 | 45 | 8.2 | 3.62 | 1.21 | 0.216 | +19.25% |
| Fair | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 18.2 | 20 | 14 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 17 | 8.2 | 5.79 | 1.45 | 0.274 | -2.67% |
| Suboptimal | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.0 | 28 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 20 | 26 | 7.1 | 4.64 | 1.45 | 0.220 | -14.54% |
| Season | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating x̄ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 31.1 | 32 | 23 | 23 | 7 | 16 | 27 | 7.8 | 6.61 | 1.53 | 0.256 | 2.23 |
| 2025 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 44.1 | 42 | 20 | 19 | 4 | 21 | 42 | 8.5 | 3.86 | 1.42 | 0.249 | 3.28 |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8.3 | 0.00 | 1.15 | 0.188 | 4.88 |
| 2023 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25.1 | 17 | 14 | 12 | 7 | 11 | 20 | 7.1 | 4.26 | 1.11 | 0.183 | 3.12 |
|
Date
|
Opponent | Decision | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K |
Composite
Score |
Output
Level |
TriSync
Projection |
Game
Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2026 | @MIA | 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | Fair | 4.00 | |||
| Sep 24, 2026 | CIN | L | 2.0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Fair | 2.41 | ||
| Sep 20, 2026 | @HOU | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | Fair | 5.31 | |||
| Sep 14, 2026 | @CHC | 5.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | Good | 2.27 | |||
| Sep 8, 2026 | TB | L | 3.1 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | Suboptimal | 0.73 | ||
| Aug 26, 2026 | LAD | 5.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | Suboptimal | 1.57 | |||
| Aug 19, 2026 | @MIN | 4.1 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | Good | 0.64 | |||
| Jul 29, 2026 | @NYM | 4.1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | Good | 2.99 | |||
| May 29, 2025 | @PHI | 2.2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Good | 2.25 | |||
| May 22, 2025 | @WSH | 3.0 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 1 | Fair | -2.78 | |||
| May 15, 2025 | WSH | W | 6.0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | Good | 6.57 | ||
| May 10, 2025 | @PIT | 5.2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | Good | 4.84 | |||
| May 5, 2025 | CIN | W | 8.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | Suboptimal | 6.22 | ||
| Apr 29, 2025 | @COL | W | 5.1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | Good | 4.34 | ||
| Apr 12, 2025 | @TB | 5.0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | Fair | 3.69 | |||
| Apr 5, 2025 | MIA | L | 4.2 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 6 | Good | 2.06 | ||
| Mar 30, 2025 | @SD | L | 4.0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | Suboptimal | 2.36 | ||
| May 23, 2024 | @CHC | 4.1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | Suboptimal | 4.88 | |||
| Sep 28, 2023 | CHC | 3.2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | Good | 4.01 | |||
| Jul 30, 2023 | MIL | 5.0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | Suboptimal | 1.44 | |||
| Jun 15, 2023 | COL | W | 5.2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | Good | 3.53 |
AJ Smith-Shawver falls into the Developing category, where predictability hasn’t fully locked in. Younger players show this as they refine their approach and physical tools. The data can point you in the right direction, but it comes with a wider margin of error.