TriSync
Sports
- "🚧 Beta currently in progress: Everything is free to explore as we refine and expand the platform."
Back to Players

Is Braxton Ashcraft projected to do well today?

Braxton Ashcraft
#35 Braxton Ashcraft
Team: Pittsburgh Pirates
Position: P
Profile: Variable
Level:
TriSync Rating:

📢 TriSync Expert Analysis

A Fair window isn’t a great spot for Braxton, based on his history. His track record in these situations has often led to lackluster outcomes. With the Variable profile introducing uncertainty, the outcomes carry risk. It’s probably best to rest unless you have a strong case to play him.

ROTO
Start
Possible

If Braxton Ashcraft takes the mound in a Fair window, expectations should be tempered. His track record suggests a probable underwhelming showing more often than not. The Variable profile keeps fluctuation high around the final metrics. This lines up as a cautious bench call.

ROTO
Start
Possible

If Ashcraft is called on today, he lands in a Fair window that hasn’t been kind to him. His usual track record in this range leans toward a probable underwhelming outing. The Variable profile adds another layer of volatility to the numbers. Best move is to bench unless you see a clear edge elsewhere.

ROTO
Start
Possible

Player Performance Cycles (30 Day Interval)

Performance Level Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)

Level G W L SV IP H R ER HR BB K K/9IP ERA WHIP BAA Game Rating +/- 
Excellent 1 0 0 0 5.0 3 1 1 0 0 4 7.2 1.80 0.60 0.167 +18.36%
Good 17 5 2 0 70.0 56 22 22 7 17 77 9.9 2.83 1.04 0.220 +2.76%
Fair 18 3 4 0 60.3 56 24 20 3 23 63 9.3 2.95 1.30 0.243 -5.61%
Suboptimal 2 1 0 0 8.1 8 1 1 0 1 8 8.6 1.08 1.08 0.242 +17.85%

Season Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)

Season G W L SV IP H R ER HR BB K K/9IP ERA WHIP BAA Game Rating x̄
2026 12 5 2 0 74.2 60 26 23 7 17 81 9.8 2.77 1.03 0.221 4.53
2025 26 4 4 0 69.2 63 22 21 3 24 71 9.2 2.71 1.25 0.239 3.98

Individual Game Stats

Date Opponent Decision IP H R ER HR BB K TriSync Rating TriSync Level Game Rating
May 31, 2026 MIN W 6.0 5 2 2 1 0 11 2.90 Fair 6.42
May 26, 2026 CHC W 6.1 7 1 1 0 1 5 1.92 Suboptimal 4.98
May 21, 2026 @STL W 7.0 4 1 1 1 2 9 4.50 Good 6.47
May 15, 2026 PHI 6.2 7 4 4 1 0 5 5.50 Good 2.15
May 9, 2026 @SF W 7.0 6 1 1 1 0 6 4.56 Good 5.86
May 3, 2026 CIN 7.2 4 0 0 0 2 6 3.61 Fair 5.99
Apr 28, 2026 STL L 4.1 6 6 6 2 3 7 5.43 Good -0.02
Apr 22, 2026 @TEX 7.0 4 2 2 1 2 5 4.06 Good 3.79
Apr 16, 2026 WSH 5.2 5 5 2 0 2 7 3.67 Fair 3.96
Apr 11, 2026 @CHC 5.0 4 1 1 0 1 9 5.45 Good 5.76
Apr 5, 2026 BAL W 6.0 4 1 1 0 0 8 4.62 Good 6.57
Mar 30, 2026 @CIN L 6.0 4 2 2 0 4 3 2.39 Fair 2.45
Sep 25, 2025 @CIN L 4.1 8 2 2 0 1 5 5.41 Good 2.99
Sep 20, 2025 ATH 3.0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4.84 Good 6.27
Sep 15, 2025 CHC L 4.0 6 3 3 1 2 4 3.65 Fair 1.80
Sep 9, 2025 @BAL 3.0 2 1 1 1 2 4 3.52 Fair 3.88
Sep 3, 2025 LAD 3.0 2 0 0 0 4 4 2.29 Fair 4.17
Aug 28, 2025 @STL 5.2 4 1 1 0 1 5 3.95 Good 4.69
Aug 22, 2025 COL W 5.0 1 0 0 0 1 6 5.30 Good 6.83
Aug 15, 2025 @CHC 5.0 3 1 1 0 0 4 6.16 Excellent 4.71
Aug 9, 2025 CIN 3.1 3 1 1 0 1 5 2.65 Fair 4.39
Aug 5, 2025 SF 2.1 5 2 2 0 0 3 2.41 Fair 2.75
Aug 2, 2025 @COL L 2.0 5 3 3 0 0 2 3.06 Fair 1.57
Jul 29, 2025 @SF W 3.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3.40 Fair 5.36
Jul 25, 2025 AZ L 2.0 0 1 0 0 1 2 2.42 Fair 4.57
Jul 21, 2025 DET 1.0 0 0 0 0 1 1 5.30 Good 4.08
Jul 18, 2025 CWS 1.0 2 2 2 0 4 0 3.20 Fair 0.98
Jul 9, 2025 @KC 2.1 3 0 0 0 0 3 2.87 Fair 4.78
Jul 4, 2025 @SEA 2.1 4 2 2 1 0 2 5.52 Good 2.61
Jun 28, 2025 NYM W 2.2 5 1 1 0 0 2 3.28 Fair 3.96
Jun 23, 2025 @MIL 3.0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2.52 Fair 4.91
Jun 20, 2025 TEX 2.0 4 1 1 0 1 2 3.61 Fair 3.11
Jun 14, 2025 @CHC 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3.73 Fair 4.86
Jun 11, 2025 MIA 0.1 1 1 1 0 2 0 4.26 Good 2.38
Jun 8, 2025 PHI W 1.1 1 0 0 0 2 0 4.23 Good 4.00
Jun 4, 2025 HOU 2.0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1.78 Suboptimal 5.01
Jun 1, 2025 @SD 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5.54 Good 4.66
May 26, 2025 @AZ 3.0 2 0 0 0 1 1 3.96 Good 4.17