TriSync
Sports
- "🚧 Beta currently in progress: Everything is free to explore as we refine and expand the platform."
Back to Players

Should I start or sit Emerson Hancock today?

Emerson Hancock
#26 Emerson Hancock
Team: Seattle Mariners
Position: P
Profile: Aligned
TriSync Rating:
TriSync Level:

📢 TriSync Expert Analysis

Emerson Hancock is in an Excellent performance window (TriSync Rating >= 5.55), highlighting his cycles are aligned for elite production. With an Aligned profile, his actual results tend to follow those cycles closely.

PI=3.62 PIVS=4.31

ROTO
Start
Possible

Emerson is in an Excellent performance window (TriSync Rating >= 5.55), signaling his cycles are aligned for top-level production. With an Aligned profile, his actual results tend to follow those cycles closely.

PI=3.61 PIVS=4.61

ROTO
Start
Possible

Emerson Hancock is in a Suboptimal performance window (TriSync Rating < 1.95), signaling a poor end result. With an Aligned profile, his performances tend to follow those cycles closely, thus, increasing the likelihood of a lackluster performance.

PI=2.66 PIVS=3.29

ROTO
Sit
Bench

Player Performance Cycles (30 Day Interval)

Performance Level Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)

Level G W L SV IP H R ER HR BB K K/9IP ERA WHIP BAA Game Rating +/- 
Excellent 4 2 0 0 17.1 21 11 9 3 1 10 5.2 4.67 1.27 0.304 +9.07%
Good 16 5 4 0 74.0 64 36 32 10 26 69 8.4 3.89 1.22 0.231 +17.59%
Fair 17 3 4 0 76.1 78 44 43 15 26 44 5.2 5.07 1.36 0.267 -14.05%
Suboptimal 4 0 2 0 18.2 19 9 9 2 4 11 5.3 4.34 1.23 0.260 -19.74%

Season Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)

Season G W L SV IP H R ER HR BB K K/9IP ERA WHIP BAA Game Rating x̄
2026 4 2 1 0 23.2 14 6 6 2 4 25 9.5 2.28 0.76 0.175 5.08
2025 22 4 5 0 90.0 93 51 49 15 31 64 6.4 4.90 1.38 0.269 2.76
2024 12 4 4 0 60.2 62 37 32 12 19 39 5.8 4.75 1.34 0.259 2.54
2023 3 0 0 0 12.0 13 6 6 1 3 6 4.5 4.50 1.33 0.283 2.65

Individual Game Stats

Date Opponent Decision IP H R ER HR BB K TriSync Rating TriSync Level Game Rating
Apr 15, 2026 @SD 6.0 4 2 2 1 1 6 2.22 Fair 4.17
Apr 10, 2026 HOU W 5.0 4 3 3 0 2 5 4.56 Good 3.11
Apr 4, 2026 @LAA L 6.2 6 1 1 1 0 5 0.97 Suboptimal 4.89
Mar 29, 2026 CLE W 6.0 0 0 0 0 1 9 5.53 Good 8.14
Sep 25, 2025 COL 4.0 2 0 0 0 0 7 4.44 Good 6.47
Sep 16, 2025 @KC 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.88 Suboptimal 4.08
Sep 14, 2025 LAA 1.2 1 0 0 0 0 2 5.37 Good 4.64
Sep 10, 2025 STL W 2.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.53 Fair 4.86
Sep 7, 2025 @ATL 1.0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4.99 Good 3.79
Sep 3, 2025 @TB 2.0 4 1 1 0 1 0 2.54 Fair 2.55
Sep 1, 2025 @TB 1.0 3 3 1 0 0 2 6.59 Excellent 3.35
Jul 1, 2025 KC L 6.0 7 5 5 0 3 1 1.28 Suboptimal -0.65
Jun 26, 2025 @MIN L 5.0 3 2 2 1 3 2 2.16 Fair 2.41
Jun 21, 2025 @CHC L 4.0 6 9 9 4 3 5 2.46 Fair -2.86
Jun 15, 2025 CLE W 7.0 2 0 0 0 1 4 4.79 Good 6.47
Jun 9, 2025 @AZ 5.0 6 2 2 1 3 3 2.91 Fair 2.27
Jun 4, 2025 BAL 5.2 2 1 1 1 2 6 3.44 Fair 4.99
May 29, 2025 WSH 5.1 2 2 2 0 3 4 4.35 Good 3.18
May 23, 2025 @HOU W 6.0 9 3 3 1 0 3 5.56 Excellent 2.59
May 17, 2025 @SD 4.2 6 1 1 1 1 3 4.79 Good 3.62
May 12, 2025 NYY L 5.0 8 7 7 3 4 5 4.35 Good -1.71
May 6, 2025 @ATH 6.0 4 2 2 0 2 2 3.64 Fair 2.74
Apr 30, 2025 LAA 6.0 9 3 3 1 2 4 2.66 Fair 1.76
Apr 23, 2025 @BOS W 6.0 5 2 2 0 2 7 4.20 Good 4.61
Apr 17, 2025 @CIN 5.0 5 2 2 1 0 4 6.15 Excellent 3.54
Mar 31, 2025 DET L 0.2 7 6 6 1 1 0 2.72 Fair -2.06
Sep 28, 2024 OAK 5.1 5 3 3 2 4 3 4.78 Good 1.36
Sep 21, 2024 @TEX W 5.0 5 2 2 1 0 3 4.54 Good 3.83
Sep 13, 2024 TEX 5.0 6 3 3 1 1 5 1.90 Suboptimal 2.55
Jul 6, 2024 TOR L 4.0 6 2 2 0 1 4 3.27 Fair 2.92
Jun 13, 2024 CWS 7.0 6 2 2 2 2 1 3.03 Fair 2.36
May 7, 2024 @MIN 4.0 4 4 4 1 2 0 2.66 Fair 0.18
May 1, 2024 ATL L 3.2 5 5 1 0 4 4 3.93 Good 3.00
Apr 26, 2024 AZ W 6.0 2 1 1 1 2 4 2.52 Fair 5.06
Apr 21, 2024 @COL W 6.0 4 2 1 0 1 4 3.11 Fair 5.06
Apr 13, 2024 CHC L 6.0 4 2 2 1 0 4 4.39 Good 3.88
Apr 7, 2024 @MIL L 3.1 11 8 8 2 1 6 4.52 Good -2.11
Apr 1, 2024 CLE W 5.1 4 3 3 1 1 1 7.05 Excellent 2.33
Aug 20, 2023 @HOU 2.0 2 0 0 0 0 2 2.49 Fair 4.57
Aug 15, 2023 @KC 5.0 9 5 5 1 0 1 2.11 Fair -0.30
Aug 9, 2023 SD 5.0 2 1 1 0 3 3 4.23 Good 3.69