TriSync
Sports

Sign in to your account

Don't have an account?

Sign up to unlock these benefits:

  • Current ratings, projections and analysis
  • Advanced reports and managerial tools
  • Build and save roster of favorite players

Already have an account?

Reset your password

Ready to try again?

Check your email

📬

If an account exists for the email address provided, a password reset link is on the way.

Ready to try again?

Set a new password

Ready to try again?

Password updated

Password has been successfully changed. Please sign in with your new password.

Email verified

Email address has been confirmed. You're all set!

Verification failed

This verification link is invalid or has already been used.

TriSync
Sports
Early access period, all features unlocked with free membership. 🔐
Back to Players

Should I start or sit Emmet Sheehan today?

Emmet Sheehan
#80 Emmet Sheehan
Team: Los Angeles Dodgers
Position: P
Profile: Aligned
Output Level: Loading...
TriSync Projection: Loading...

📢 TriSync Expert Analysis

With a Composite score greater than or equal to 3.75 and less than 5.55, Sheehan enters a Good window, where solid performance is strongly supported. His Aligned profile strengthens this reliably marginal edge, as his results historically track his cycles more dependably than Variable profiles.

vs CIN - Opposing Pitcher TriSync Projection: 2.46

ROTO
Sit
Bench

This range points to a controlled, disciplined level of production. With an Aligned profile, Sheehan's historical tendency to follow his pattern adds trust that this edge will hold.

Opposing Pitcher: N/A

ROTO
Sit
Bench

Even in a Fair window, Emmet is outperforming his standard inputs. His Aligned profile supports numbers that follow that increase closely. The predictability adds value.

@ MIA - Opposing Pitcher TriSync Projection: 3.29

ROTO
Start
Possible

Player Performance Cycles (30 Day Interval)

  • Capacity - Tracks strength, stamina, coordination and overall physical capacity
  • Competitiveness - Tracks awareness, state of mind and emotional temperament
  • Cognitive - Tracks mental alertness, critical thinking and decision-making ability

  • Composite - Reflects overall alignment & coordination of the 3 individual cycles

Performance Level Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)

Level G W L SV IP H R ER HR BB K K/9IP ERA WHIP BAA Game Rating +/-
Excellent 4 2 0 0 19.0 9 4 3 2 3 24 11.4 1.42 0.63 0.134 +56.94%
Good 16 4 1 0 79.0 62 42 41 11 31 91 10.4 4.67 1.18 0.215 -8.14%
Fair 27 8 10 1 127.3 109 64 59 26 38 147 10.3 4.15 1.15 0.227 +2.81%
Suboptimal 2 1 1 0 8.2 11 10 10 0 7 9 9.3 10.38 2.08 0.297 -86.72%

Season Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)

Season G W L SV IP H R ER HR BB K K/9IP ERA WHIP BAA Game Rating x̄
2026 21 5 8 0 100.3 96 58 57 21 31 118 10.5 5.08 1.26 0.247 3.19
2025 15 6 3 0 73.1 49 29 23 7 22 89 10.9 2.82 0.97 0.185 4.61
2023 13 4 1 1 60.1 46 33 33 11 26 64 9.5 4.92 1.19 0.210 3.23

Individual Game Stats

Click column titles for more information & detailed explanations
Date
Opponent Decision IP H R ER HR BB K
Composite
Score
Output
Level
Game
Rating
Sep 7, 2026 CIN W 5.2 3 1 1 1 1 10 2.46 Fair 6.97
Aug 2, 2026 BOS L 2.2 6 5 5 3 1 4 2.05 Fair 0.21
Jul 26, 2026 @NYM 5.0 3 1 1 0 2 5 4.38 Good 4.42
Jul 20, 2026 @PHI L 5.1 8 6 6 2 1 6 2.47 Fair 0.15
Jul 12, 2026 AZ 5.1 3 3 2 0 1 7 4.49 Good 4.49
Jul 5, 2026 SD L 4.1 3 1 1 0 3 5 3.72 Fair 4.00
Jun 28, 2026 @SD W 5.0 2 1 1 1 2 5 2.16 Fair 5.16
Jun 21, 2026 BAL L 3.1 8 6 6 2 3 4 3.98 Good -1.23
Jun 14, 2026 @CWS L 5.0 4 3 3 1 1 8 2.60 Fair 3.69
Jun 7, 2026 LAA L 1.1 3 2 2 0 2 2 3.29 Fair 2.01
Jun 1, 2026 @AZ L 6.1 3 2 2 2 0 3 2.45 Fair 3.80
May 25, 2026 COL 6.0 5 2 2 0 1 8 3.91 Good 4.61
May 19, 2026 @SD 4.0 5 4 4 2 1 2 4.05 Good 0.85
May 14, 2026 SF W 6.0 2 2 2 1 2 6 2.99 Fair 4.76
May 8, 2026 ATL 4.2 6 1 1 0 1 7 3.47 Fair 4.79
May 1, 2026 @STL L 4.2 8 4 4 2 0 8 2.52 Fair 2.48
Apr 24, 2026 CHC 6.1 4 1 1 0 1 10 3.74 Fair 6.34
Apr 18, 2026 @COL 5.0 4 2 2 0 2 4 3.39 Fair 3.11
Apr 11, 2026 TEX W 6.0 4 3 3 2 1 6 6.02 Excellent 3.88
Apr 3, 2026 @WSH W 5.2 7 4 4 1 3 2 3.34 Fair 0.87
Mar 27, 2026 AZ 3.1 5 4 4 1 2 6 4.84 Good 1.55
Sep 26, 2025 @SEA 1.0 1 1 0 0 0 3 5.84 Excellent 4.81
Sep 21, 2025 SF 7.0 1 0 0 0 0 10 2.16 Fair 8.19
Sep 15, 2025 PHI 5.2 1 1 1 0 3 7 3.81 Good 5.14
Sep 9, 2025 COL W 7.0 3 1 1 0 1 9 4.82 Good 6.94
Sep 3, 2025 @PIT L 4.2 5 2 2 2 2 6 3.46 Fair 3.48
Aug 25, 2025 CIN W 7.0 2 0 0 0 1 10 6.78 Excellent 8.35
Aug 19, 2025 @COL W 6.0 6 4 4 2 2 7 4.30 Good 2.74
Aug 12, 2025 @LAA 5.0 5 5 5 1 2 6 4.22 Good 1.03
Aug 5, 2025 STL W 5.0 4 2 0 1 1 5 3.74 Fair 6.06
Jul 30, 2025 @CIN L 3.2 1 3 0 0 3 5 1.99 Fair 5.04
Jul 25, 2025 @BOS W 5.0 3 2 2 0 2 5 1.87 Suboptimal 4.12
Jul 19, 2025 MIL L 3.0 7 5 5 1 1 3 2.45 Fair -0.13
Jul 12, 2025 @SF W 4.1 2 1 1 0 3 3 5.54 Good 4.14
Jul 6, 2025 HOU 5.0 5 1 1 0 1 4 2.17 Fair 4.12
Jun 18, 2025 SD 4.0 3 1 1 0 0 6 3.07 Fair 5.11
Sep 27, 2023 @COL W 6.0 5 2 2 2 0 10 2.43 Fair 6.12
Sep 21, 2023 SF 4.2 0 1 1 0 4 9 3.78 Good 5.39
Sep 16, 2023 @SEA 3.0 1 0 0 0 0 5 3.64 Fair 5.81
Sep 8, 2023 @WSH 4.1 6 5 5 2 1 4 4.10 Good 0.51
Sep 2, 2023 ATL 4.0 3 1 1 1 3 6 3.92 Good 4.22
Aug 3, 2023 OAK SV 4.0 2 2 2 2 1 3 3.62 Fair 3.79
Jul 29, 2023 CIN 5.0 2 0 0 0 1 5 5.61 Excellent 5.76
Jul 23, 2023 @TEX L 3.2 8 8 8 0 5 4 1.87 Suboptimal -3.16
Jul 17, 2023 @BAL W 5.0 5 4 4 1 3 2 3.39 Fair 1.03
Jul 4, 2023 PIT 3.2 4 5 5 1 4 4 2.37 Fair -0.15
Jun 29, 2023 @COL W 5.0 7 3 3 0 0 5 4.09 Good 3.26
Jun 23, 2023 HOU W 6.0 3 2 2 2 2 4 2.80 Fair 4.03
Jun 16, 2023 SF 6.0 0 0 0 0 2 3 5.32 Good 5.36