Sign up for free to continue browsing!
Sign in to your account
Don't have an account?
Sign up to unlock these benefits:
- Current ratings, projections and analysis
- Advanced reports and managerial tools
- Build and save roster of favorite players
Already have an account?
Reset your password
Ready to try again?
Check your email
Ready to try again?
Set a new password
Ready to try again?
Password updated
Email verified
Verification failed
Back to Players
Should I start or sit Gage Jump today?
#61 Gage Jump
Team: Athletics
Position: P
Profile: Developing
Output Level: Loading...
TriSync Projection: Loading...
📢 TriSync Expert Analysis
LEAGUE
Sit
Don't Roster
With a Developing profile, Gage Jump’s performance trends are still stabilizing. This window often includes uneven results as routines and timing improve. The ratings can be helpful, but they carry more uncertainty with a restricted sample of data.
Opposing Pitcher: N/A
LEAGUE
Sit
Don't Roster
Gage is in the Developing tier, where his cycle-performance correlation is still forming. Younger players fall into this category while building predictability. The ratings are useful, but variability is higher, especially early on.
Opposing Pitcher: N/A
LEAGUE
Sit
Don't Roster
Player Performance Cycles (30 Day Interval)
- Capacity - Tracks strength, stamina, coordination and overall physical capacity
- Competitiveness - Tracks awareness, state of mind and emotional temperament
- Cognitive - Tracks mental alertness, critical thinking and decision-making ability
- Composite - Reflects overall alignment & coordination of the individual cycles
Performance Level Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)
| Level | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 11.2 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 18 | 13.9 | 2.31 | 1.29 | 0.239 | +96.31% |
| Good | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 20.0 | 14 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 15 | 6.8 | 4.50 | 1.20 | 0.194 | +8.84% |
| Fair | 12 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 59.1 | 67 | 40 | 39 | 8 | 27 | 64 | 9.7 | 5.92 | 1.58 | 0.293 | -10.23% |
| Suboptimal | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7.2 | 12 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 12.9 | 9.39 | 2.22 | 0.343 | -52.62% |
Season Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)
| Season | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating x̄ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 20 | 6 | 11 | 0 | 98.2 | 104 | 62 | 60 | 12 | 46 | 108 | 9.9 | 5.47 | 1.52 | 0.272 | 2.67 |
Individual Game Stats
Click column titles for more information & detailed explanations
|
Date
|
Opponent | Decision | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K |
Composite
Score |
Output
Level |
TriSync
Projection |
Game
Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2026 | SEA | L | 2.0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | Good | -0.30 | ||
| Sep 6, 2026 | @SEA | L | 4.0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | Fair | 4.08 | ||
| Aug 31, 2026 | @TEX | L | 4.1 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 2 | Fair | -2.07 | ||
| Aug 25, 2026 | MIN | W | 6.1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | Good | 5.58 | ||
| Aug 20, 2026 | @KC | L | 4.0 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 3 | Suboptimal | -0.61 | ||
| Aug 14, 2026 | TEX | 5.1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | Good | 1.09 | |||
| Aug 8, 2026 | @BOS | W | 6.0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 11 | Excellent | 5.66 | ||
| Aug 2, 2026 | DET | L | 3.2 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 5 | Fair | -1.18 | ||
| Jul 28, 2026 | BOS | W | 6.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 | Fair | 6.12 | ||
| Jul 22, 2026 | @AZ | L | 4.2 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Fair | -1.01 | ||
| Jul 5, 2026 | MIA | L | 3.0 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | Fair | -1.29 | ||
| Jun 29, 2026 | LAD | L | 4.2 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 5 | Fair | 0.43 | ||
| Jun 24, 2026 | @SF | 5.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | Fair | 6.83 | |||
| Jun 18, 2026 | LAA | W | 7.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | Fair | 6.94 | ||
| Jun 12, 2026 | COL | 5.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | Fair | 2.97 | |||
| Jun 2, 2026 | @CHC | W | 7.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | Fair | 5.71 |
As a Developing profile player, Gage hasn’t yet shown a steady link between cycles and outputs. This usually reflects youth and ongoing adjustment. The ratings provide insight, but the confidence level is lower with a low sample size.