TriSync
Sports

Sign in to your account

Don't have an account?

Sign up to unlock these benefits:

  • Current ratings, projections and analysis
  • Advanced reports and managerial tools
  • Build and save roster of favorite players

Already have an account?

Reset your password

Ready to try again?

Check your email

📬

If an account exists for the email address provided, a password reset link is on the way.

Ready to try again?

Set a new password

Ready to try again?

Password updated

Password has been successfully changed. Please sign in with your new password.

Email verified

Email address has been confirmed. You're all set!

Verification failed

This verification link is invalid or has already been used.

TriSync
Sports
Early access period, all features unlocked with free membership. 🔐
Back to Players

Is Marco Gonzales projected to do well today?

Marco Gonzales
#50 Marco Gonzales
Team: Texas Rangers
Position: P
Profile: Aligned
Output Level: Loading...
TriSync Projection: Loading...

📢 TriSync Expert Analysis

This Excellent window (>= 5.55) suggests Gonzales is trending toward optimal effectiveness. His Aligned profile enhances that outlook, as his performance is more dependable relative to his cycle than players with Variable tendencies. Gonzales's best run-prevention numbers come in the Excellent period, where a 2.83 ERA tops every other performance tier. When his TriSync rating crests, he pitches like a true high-end arm.

@ SEA - Opposing Pitcher TriSync Projection: 3.90

ROTO
Start
Top Tier

Being in an Excellent game output range indicates Gonzales's internal metrics are lining up for success. Since he is Aligned, those metrics tend to translate directly into end results, giving him a higher floor than Variable profiles. The Excellent stage is where Gonzales becomes a true run stopper. A 2.83 ERA, his lowest across all levels, tells you the opposition is going to be helpless when his TriSync is elevated.

@ AZ - Opposing Pitcher: N/A

ROTO
Start
Top Tier

Operating below the 1.95 threshold, Gonzales is in a down sequence where outcomes tend to fall short. His Aligned profile reinforces that sequence, suggesting a higher probability of a flat performance.

@ AZ - Opposing Pitcher: N/A

ROTO
Sit
Bench

Player Performance Cycles (30 Day Interval)

  • Capacity - Tracks strength, stamina, coordination and overall physical capacity
  • Competitiveness - Tracks awareness, state of mind and emotional temperament
  • Cognitive - Tracks mental alertness, critical thinking and decision-making ability

  • Composite - Reflects overall alignment & coordination of the 3 individual cycles

Performance Level Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)

Level G W L SV IP H R ER HR BB K K/9IP ERA WHIP BAA Game Rating +/-
Excellent 6 3 2 0 35.0 34 12 11 3 10 24 6.2 2.83 1.26 0.254 +32.51%
Good 32 10 12 0 165.0 174 90 83 34 48 115 6.3 4.53 1.35 0.268 +1.81%
Fair 30 9 8 1 165.2 159 81 72 24 48 99 5.4 3.91 1.25 0.254 +6.18%
Suboptimal 9 3 1 0 51.0 57 28 28 8 19 33 5.8 4.94 1.49 0.285 -21.69%

Season Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)

Season G W L SV IP H R ER HR BB K K/9IP ERA WHIP BAA Game Rating x̄
2026 3 0 0 1 6.2 7 1 1 0 4 3 4.0 1.35 1.65 0.280 3.79
2024 7 1 1 0 33.2 43 17 17 5 11 23 6.1 4.54 1.60 0.312 2.45
2023 10 4 1 0 50.0 55 32 29 5 18 34 6.1 5.22 1.46 0.282 2.34
2022 32 10 15 0 183.0 194 97 84 30 50 103 5.1 4.13 1.33 0.271 2.54
2021 25 10 6 0 143.1 125 64 63 29 42 108 6.8 3.96 1.17 0.234 3.14

Individual Game Stats

Click column titles for more information & detailed explanations
Date
Opponent Decision IP H R ER HR BB K
Composite
Score
Output
Level
TriSync
Projection
Game
Rating
Aug 14, 2026 @ATH 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.70 Fair 3.27 4.01
Jul 30, 2026 @TB 3.0 5 1 1 0 2 1 4.58 Good 3.21 2.59
Jul 21, 2026 CWS SV 3.0 2 0 0 0 2 2 2.02 Fair N/A 4.76
Aug 7, 2024 SD 4.2 8 5 5 2 2 3 2.43 Fair 3.09 -0.23
Jul 27, 2024 @AZ 2.1 7 4 4 2 3 1 4.78 Good 3.77 -0.50
Jul 21, 2024 PHI L 4.2 6 2 2 0 1 4 5.94 Excellent 4.78 3.05
Jul 12, 2024 @CWS W 5.0 7 1 1 0 0 4 2.31 Fair 3.25 4.71
Apr 13, 2024 @PHI 6.0 6 2 2 1 3 5 1.60 Suboptimal 1.92 3.02
Apr 7, 2024 BAL 6.0 5 2 2 0 0 4 4.86 Good 2.78 3.74
Apr 1, 2024 @WSH 5.0 4 1 1 0 2 2 1.40 Suboptimal 1.58 3.40
May 28, 2023 PIT 5.2 3 1 1 0 3 4 4.09 Good 2.44 3.96
May 23, 2023 OAK W 6.0 5 2 2 0 1 4 7.20 Excellent 3.05 4.03
May 17, 2023 @BOS L 1.2 8 8 8 1 2 1 3.76 Good 2.75 -3.48
May 12, 2023 @DET W 6.0 5 2 2 1 1 2 2.78 Fair 2.55 3.45
May 6, 2023 HOU 6.0 6 3 3 0 3 4 3.46 Fair 2.57 1.90
Apr 30, 2023 @TOR 3.0 8 8 5 1 1 2 3.11 Fair 2.73 -0.52
Apr 25, 2023 @PHI W 5.0 4 1 1 1 1 2 4.99 Good 2.72 4.27
Apr 19, 2023 MIL 6.0 4 2 2 0 1 9 5.48 Good 2.62 5.06
Apr 8, 2023 @CLE W 5.2 6 1 1 0 3 5 3.85 Good 2.60 4.40
Apr 2, 2023 CLE 5.0 6 4 4 1 2 1 2.28 Fair 2.87 0.36
Oct 5, 2022 DET 7.0 8 4 3 0 2 5 7.08 Excellent 3.71 2.36
Sep 29, 2022 TEX 5.0 6 4 4 3 1 4 3.90 Good 2.75 1.44
Sep 23, 2022 @KC L 5.0 8 4 3 0 0 2 3.92 Good 2.89 1.71
Sep 18, 2022 @LAA L 6.1 7 5 5 3 2 4 1.20 Suboptimal 2.03 0.46
Sep 11, 2022 ATL 6.0 2 1 1 1 0 5 4.09 Good 2.82 5.36
Sep 5, 2022 CWS L 7.0 4 3 3 2 1 3 4.04 Good 2.86 2.64
Aug 31, 2022 @DET W 6.0 7 3 3 0 1 1 1.47 Suboptimal 1.85 2.03
Aug 25, 2022 CLE W 6.0 4 1 1 0 1 4 4.21 Good 2.55 5.06
Aug 19, 2022 @OAK W 5.1 6 2 1 0 2 1 1.96 Fair 2.87 3.47
Aug 13, 2022 @TEX L 5.0 9 5 5 1 0 2 3.05 Fair 3.14 -0.04
Aug 7, 2022 LAA W 6.0 8 3 3 0 1 7 3.91 Good 2.70 3.59
Aug 1, 2022 @NYY L 5.1 9 6 6 3 3 5 4.02 Good 3.07 -0.76
Jul 27, 2022 TEX W 7.0 4 2 2 0 1 5 1.68 Suboptimal 1.36 4.66
Jul 22, 2022 HOU L 5.2 9 5 5 3 1 2 4.09 Good 3.31 -0.19
Jul 14, 2022 @TEX 6.0 11 5 5 0 2 4 1.00 Suboptimal 1.90 -0.13
Jul 7, 2022 TOR W 6.2 8 3 2 0 0 0 3.92 Good 3.30 2.86
Jul 1, 2022 OAK L 6.0 8 2 2 0 1 2 5.05 Good 3.19 2.45
Jun 26, 2022 @LAA L 6.0 5 2 2 1 4 5 6.01 Excellent 4.83 2.88
Jun 21, 2022 @OAK W 7.0 7 2 2 1 1 2 2.98 Fair 3.35 3.35
Jun 15, 2022 MIN L 6.2 3 1 1 0 2 2 2.59 Fair 3.32 3.86
Jun 10, 2022 BOS 4.1 2 2 2 1 6 4 1.34 Suboptimal 1.55 2.15
Jun 4, 2022 @TEX L 7.0 5 3 3 1 1 5 5.04 Good 3.11 3.07
May 29, 2022 HOU L 7.1 5 2 2 1 1 2 3.29 Fair 3.27 3.13
May 23, 2022 OAK W 5.1 8 5 5 1 0 3 1.21 Suboptimal 2.10 0.96
May 18, 2022 @TOR W 6.0 5 1 1 0 3 2 3.21 Fair 3.25 3.74
May 13, 2022 @NYM 6.2 5 1 1 0 3 5 3.86 Good 3.09 4.15
May 7, 2022 TB L 5.1 6 3 2 2 4 1 2.64 Fair 3.38 1.50
May 2, 2022 @HOU L 6.0 8 3 3 2 2 2 4.03 Good 3.27 1.35
Apr 27, 2022 @TB L 0.1 1 1 1 0 1 1 3.78 Good 3.27 2.94
Apr 21, 2022 TEX 4.2 6 6 2 1 1 6 2.62 Fair 3.36 3.62
Apr 15, 2022 HOU W 7.0 4 1 1 0 0 6 2.65 Fair 3.23 6.17
Apr 10, 2022 @MIN L 2.0 6 6 2 3 2 1 4.70 Good 3.62 1.44
Oct 1, 2021 LAA L 6.0 3 2 2 0 2 5 2.17 Fair 2.85 3.74
Sep 26, 2021 @LAA W 7.0 3 1 1 1 3 5 5.10 Good 3.03 5.11
Sep 21, 2021 @OAK W 6.0 4 2 2 2 1 3 6.85 Excellent 5.23 3.88
Sep 15, 2021 BOS 6.0 3 3 3 1 2 7 3.40 Fair 2.80 3.45
Sep 10, 2021 AZ W 6.0 5 3 2 1 1 3 4.26 Good 2.93 3.74
Sep 4, 2021 @AZ W 5.0 8 5 5 2 1 2 2.98 Fair 3.04 0.36
Aug 29, 2021 KC W 7.0 5 2 2 2 2 4 3.41 Fair 2.94 3.93
Aug 23, 2021 @OAK 6.0 5 3 3 2 0 2 3.59 Fair 3.02 2.31
Aug 18, 2021 @TEX W 5.1 6 0 0 0 1 3 5.88 Excellent 2.92 5.23
Aug 12, 2021 TEX W 9.0 2 1 1 1 1 9 4.43 Good 2.17 7.51
Aug 6, 2021 @NYY 6.2 3 0 0 0 2 5 3.74 Fair 2.65 5.64
Aug 1, 2021 @TEX 6.0 5 1 1 0 0 4 3.69 Fair 2.32 4.61
Jul 25, 2021 OAK W 5.2 5 2 2 1 2 4 2.20 Fair 2.05 3.67
Jul 20, 2021 @COL W 5.0 6 2 2 1 3 3 4.24 Good 2.03 2.83
Jul 9, 2021 LAA 5.2 7 3 3 2 1 3 4.31 Good 2.05 1.97
Jul 3, 2021 TEX L 3.1 8 7 7 3 2 4 4.39 Good 3.31 -1.74
Jun 20, 2021 TB 6.1 5 2 2 0 3 6 3.45 Fair 1.68 3.52
Jun 14, 2021 MIN 5.0 8 3 3 2 2 5 1.39 Suboptimal 2.38 1.99
Jun 8, 2021 @DET L 4.0 5 4 4 1 1 2 3.82 Good 4.54 0.85
Jun 1, 2021 OAK 4.0 2 1 1 1 1 6 4.48 Good 4.12 4.96
Apr 27, 2021 @HOU L 6.0 5 2 2 0 3 4 3.18 Fair 1.22 2.88
Apr 20, 2021 LAD L 7.0 2 1 1 0 1 6 2.63 Fair -0.77 5.56
Apr 15, 2021 @BAL W 5.0 3 2 2 1 2 5 3.91 Good -0.73 4.12
Apr 8, 2021 @MIN L 4.1 9 7 7 2 2 6 2.85 Fair -0.42 -1.19
Apr 1, 2021 SF 6.0 8 5 5 3 3 2 3.36 Fair N/A -0.52