Sports - "🚧 Beta currently in progress: Everything is free to explore as we refine and expand the platform."
Back to Players
Is Mick Abel projected to do well today?
#20 Mick Abel
Team: Minnesota Twins
Profile: Developing
Level:
TriSync Rating:
📢 TriSync Expert Analysis
ROTO
Start
Possible
As a Developing profile player, Mick Abel hasn’t yet shown a steady link between cycles and end results. This usually reflects youth and ongoing adjustment. The ratings provide insight, but the confidence level is lower with a narrow sample size.
ROTO
Start
Possible
With a Developing profile, Abel’s metrics don’t yet consistently match his cycle indicators. He’s still in the sequence of growth where patterns are forming. The ratings have limited value, especially with a low amount of games played, expect some unpredictability.
ROTO
Sit
Don't Roster
Player Performance Cycles (30 Day Interval)
Performance Level Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)
| Level | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.0 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6.0 | 18.00 | 3.00 | 0.467 | -151.39% |
| Good | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 28.0 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 | 29 | 9.3 | 2.89 | 1.07 | 0.178 | +43.53% |
| Fair | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 27.1 | 33 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 30 | 9.9 | 5.27 | 1.61 | 0.300 | -2.89% |
| Suboptimal | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9.0 | 45.00 | 8.00 | 0.636 | -136.00% |
Season Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)
| Season | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating x̄ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 20.1 | 22 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 10 | 23 | 10.2 | 3.98 | 1.57 | 0.275 | 3.36 |
| 2025 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 39.0 | 43 | 28 | 27 | 8 | 16 | 39 | 9.0 | 6.23 | 1.51 | 0.274 | 2.76 |
Individual Game Stats
| Date | Opponent | Decision | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | TriSync Rating | TriSync Level | Game Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2026 | BOS | W | 7.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | Fair | 8.35 | |
| Apr 9, 2026 | DET | 6.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | Good | 5.36 | ||
| Apr 4, 2026 | TB | L | 4.0 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | Fair | 0.44 | |
| Mar 29, 2026 | @BAL | L | 3.1 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 4 | Fair | -0.72 | |
| Sep 27, 2025 | @PHI | W | 6.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | Fair | 7.66 | |
| Sep 20, 2025 | CLE | 4.0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | Good | 3.64 | ||
| Aug 30, 2025 | SD | L | 1.0 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Suboptimal | -0.99 | |
| Aug 23, 2025 | @CWS | L | 3.0 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | Excellent | -1.42 | |
| Jul 2, 2025 | SD | L | 1.2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3 | Good | -0.75 | |
| Jun 27, 2025 | @ATL | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Good | 3.88 | ||
| Jun 21, 2025 | NYM | L | 3.0 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | Fair | 0.53 | |
| Jun 16, 2025 | @MIA | W | 5.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | Good | 4.71 | |
| Jun 10, 2025 | CHC | 4.0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Fair | 1.25 | ||
| Jun 4, 2025 | @TOR | 5.1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | Good | 4.19 | ||
| May 18, 2025 | PIT | W | 6.0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | Good | 7.66 |
As a Developing profile player, Mick hasn’t yet shown a steady link between cycles and actual results. This usually reflects youth and ongoing adjustment. The ratings provide insight, but the confidence level is lower with a low sample size.