With a Developing profile, Kent’s performance trends are still stabilizing. This stretch often includes uneven results as routines and timing improve. The ratings can be helpful, but they carry more uncertainty with a restricted sample of data.
Zak Kent falls into the Developing category, where reliability hasn’t fully locked in. Younger players show this as they refine their game plan and physical tools. The data can point you in the right direction, but it comes with a wider margin of error.
| Level | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.0 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 13.5 | 18.00 | 3.50 | 0.500 | -39.61% |
| Good | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.2 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 9.9 | 3.55 | 1.18 | 0.245 | +11.70% |
| Fair | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7.2 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3.5 | 4.70 | 1.57 | 0.233 | -1.30% |
| Suboptimal | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5.8 | 3.86 | 1.29 | 0.188 | -2.64% |
| Season | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating x̄ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.1 | 10 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 6.7 | 5.79 | 1.61 | 0.263 | 3.18 |
| 2025 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17.2 | 17 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 16 | 8.2 | 4.58 | 1.42 | 0.254 | 3.56 |
| Date | Opponent | Decision | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | TriSync Rating | TriSync Level | Game Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | @CIN | 2.2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | Good | 2.95 | ||
| May 12, 2026 | @CIN | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | Good | 2.50 | ||
| May 9, 2026 | @MIA | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Good | 4.22 | ||
| May 6, 2026 | MIN | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Fair | 4.08 | ||
| Apr 4, 2026 | TB | 2.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | Fair | 2.69 | ||
| Apr 1, 2026 | @KC | 1.2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | Fair | 2.62 | ||
| Sep 28, 2025 | TEX | W | 2.0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Fair | 2.83 | |
| Sep 26, 2025 | TEX | 2.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Good | 4.34 | ||
| Sep 25, 2025 | DET | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Good | 3.72 | ||
| Sep 21, 2025 | @MIN | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | Good | 4.52 | ||
| Sep 20, 2025 | @MIN | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | Good | 4.66 | ||
| Sep 8, 2025 | KC | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | Excellent | 2.36 | ||
| Sep 2, 2025 | @BOS | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Suboptimal | 3.95 | ||
| Sep 1, 2025 | @BOS | 2.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Suboptimal | 3.98 | ||
| Jun 26, 2025 | TOR | 2.1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | Suboptimal | 2.47 | ||
| May 14, 2025 | MIL | 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Excellent | 1.94 | ||
| May 6, 2025 | @WSH | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Fair | 4.22 | ||
| Apr 23, 2025 | NYY | 3.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | Good | 3.74 |
As a Developing profile player, Zak Kent hasn’t yet shown a steady link between cycles and performances. This usually reflects youth and ongoing adjustment. The ratings provide insight, but the confidence level is lower with a narrow sample size.